Christiana Care Health Services Program Family Medicine Residency
(Natural News) A shocking new written report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when meaning women are given covid vaccinations during their commencement or 2nd trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous ballgame rate, killing 4 out of five unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained beneath, is self-evident from the information published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-xix Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just as agonizing as the information is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their ain calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News commodity, nosotros checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:
- Yeah, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their get-go or second trimesters.
- Yep, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this study was nearly certainly a cover-upwards to attempt to claim vaccinating significant women is perfectly safe. Simply the report data actually show quite the oppose.
Hither's how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester
Tabular array 4 from the study, shown beneath, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (Y'all have to read the fine print beneath the table to encounter this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their starting time or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the xx-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to notation that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could non have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, past definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" adding, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Put another style, it is impossible for a adult female who was vaccinated for the kickoff time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous ballgame" in the first twenty weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the showtime 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't fourth dimension travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to summate the spontaneous abortion rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to prevarication with statistics," because they manifestly tried to pull a sleight-of-hand play tricks to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of v unborn babies in the first twenty weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (Information technology'south a small set up of 127 pregnant women, so we'd similar to meet a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more than clear picture show.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A simple manner to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellowish fruit and attain the number 50. They mistakenly divide l into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "fifty% of lemons are yellowish" considering it'southward 50/100.
Just the other fifty pieces of fruit can't possibly be included considering they're limes, not lemons. Then the right math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the correct answer.
In this science newspaper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" tin can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't become back in fourth dimension and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either tin can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the globe with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — so "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "prove-based" conclusions to understand the world around the states.
Still when 4 out of 5 significant women lose their babies in the beginning xx weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion charge per unit is only 12.6%. Why? Considering they're roofing upwardly the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, virtually likely.
In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to certificate adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the aforementioned error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no pregnant take a chance of adverse events? For case, here'southward some other study he co-authored: "Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Consequence Reporting Organisation (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns afterwards TIV-ID."
Simply is that conclusion based on bad math, similar the report on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the aforementioned systematic fault (or mayhap a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't exist the first time one author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and enervating they be addressed and corrected. We tin can't just accept bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't bank check out.
Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the hateful time, information technology's clear that iv out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, co-ordinate to the minor data prepare we have so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly every bit globalists hoped they would.
Retrieve: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such every bit the ovaries. Given that fasten proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human being cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in meaning women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this equally a depopulation calendar, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You tin can hear him in his ain words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this ways that live births may plummet by 3.two million over the next twelvemonth, in the USA lone, if every significant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies past the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-built-in babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land management arbiter once characterized human being children as an "environmental hazard."
This is a war. A bioweapons set on. And information technology goes across mere "crimes confronting humanity." It is a spiritual expose of the entire human being race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to assistance humanity, but are at present conspicuously shown to be working towards humanity'due south devastation.
Learn more than in today'south mind-opening Situation Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html
0 Response to "Christiana Care Health Services Program Family Medicine Residency"
Post a Comment